This Page Last Updated October 25th, 2008 (new style reckoning)

 

Frequently Asked Question’s about the Orthodox Church

A brief outline of its History

 

What is Orthodox?

What about the divisions of churches?

Do you have a Pope like the Catholic Church?

Is it similar to the Greek Orthodox Church?

What are the Old Believers?

You follow a different calendar, Easter is at a different time, why is that?

What about the Church Language used for prayer?

How do we learn what is right?

 

What is Orthodox?

The term Orthodox has its roots in two Greek words, “ortho” (which means “correct” and/or “straight”) and “doxa” (which means “worship” and/or “faith”). This term is used outside of religion, like in modern medicine, in relation to proper medical practice, and is used similarly in other non-religious context. The term is perhaps most largely used within the religious context and this is how I am using it here, specifically Eastern Christian Orthodoxy.

There have always been those who deviate from the Church. Church councils kept straight the way of faith and worship, such a council can be seen in The Acts of the Apostles. The Church always has held high the Sacred Scriptures. It was in the church councils that the Scriptures were canonized, you will likely hear of the “Canon of Scripture” as expressing what the Holy Bible is. Canons are the precepts of Councils. Modern bibles are often not even close to what the Councils understood scripture to be, so we need to be careful there. Councils have also dealt with the early errors which caused some different teachings to arise. One early error taught that Christ was not divine. The confusions of faith are now greatly multiplied.

Until one thousand years ago the popes basically conducted their Christianity in an Orthodox Christian manner, with a few exceptions not worth mentioning here. What was known as Christendom in the ancient world had strong foundations. There was One Faith, One Lord, One Baptism and One Church, not very confusing so far. Fortunately, if we test what is right we will know what is right, then we will not be confused, because what is right is never confusing.

What about the divisions of churches?

About 1000 years ago, when the Pope’s went wrong with Papism (Supremacy) there were still people with good faith in the East. The Christians in the West remained more or less with the Pope. Those Christians in the East did not remain with the Pope. The Pope established many contradictions to the councils and to faith. One, as I mentioned, was papal supremacy; others were celibacy of clergy, changing worship from bread and wine to a wafer and he also confused the Holy Trinity with the false teaching on the Filioque. At this time the Eastern Christians remained committed to the councils which used the term orthodox, so they called themselves Eastern Orthodox. It is important to say that for brief times previously that the Eastern Churches had fallen into errors of faith, temporarily, but had made a full repentance. At one of these earlier times the confusion that the Eastern Christians were in taught that Christ had only one will (during the time of St. Maximos the Confessor), then they returned to correct faith. The Roman Empire had already become Christian and its capital had moved east, to Byzantium. This New Rome became a big center for Orthodox Christianity. Just before the papists went bad Russia went all over the world looking for good faith and when they found good faith in the Eastern Christians, Russia became another Christian empire.

After the papists went wrong there are some important things to understand. England did not immediately accept the Popes confusion, but within 100 years or so England did rejoin the Pope and the errors there. England eventually separated itself from the Pope. However, England remained in many errors and therefore is now even more confused, as can be seen now by its women and homosexual ordinations, etc. These are not the only confusions or errors within the western Christianities. After the Pope had been going deeper and deeper into confusion, for about 500 years, the Protestant Reformation occurred. The Protestants had been with the Pope but rebelled due to things like Indulgences. The Protestants ended up making a multitude of different churches. Luther started the Lutheran church, he was a monk who forsook his vows and married a nun. These Protestants did not repent of all the errors that their mother Papal church had invented (such as the Filioque). Protestants have a bad foundation; a bad tree cannot have good fruit. Beyond these existing errors each Protestant church created many distinct errors of confusion themselves. It is true, as they say, that error begets error, heresy begets heresy.

 

Do Orthodox have a Pope?

Historically and scripturally it can be shown that the Church always had bishops. Among the bishops it was customary to select one who was most respected or esteemed more highly. This bishop would be given the place of honor, but his position was never more than a “first among equals”. I have heard that the patriarch of Byzantium was given an honorary title of Ecumenical Patriarch, because this was the capital of the then Christian Empire. The word ecumenical (in this sense) more-or-less means “pertaining to the whole world”. This would be as much of a Pope as the Eastern Orthodox Church ever has had, though they never accepted the erroneous ideas of Papism.

How do the Greek Orthodox fit in today?

I will say that the capital of the Greek Christian Empire, Byzantium, also known as Constantinople or New Rome, began having a real problem with wars. Byzantium, the Greeks, were scared enough to rejoin with the Latin’s in order to have more military support. This compromise of faith is all it took for God’s favor to be removed. Consequently the first Christian Empire was destroyed after existing for more than 1000 years. From that time the Greek Orthodox and those with them (like Serbian Orthodox and Bulgarian Orthodox) have gone astray. The Russian Christian Empire was rather distant and would have nothing to do with Byzantium’s false union with the Latin’s. At that time is when the “Third Rome Doctrine” began. This rightly explained how Russia was the only good Christian society left on earth. There really was not much of any other good Christian example anywhere else, and so it was. There are many things to understand how this all came about, but today the Greeks are basically faithless.

What are the Old Believers?

Russia was left to carry the torch and they did well till a future Russian patriarch went to the fallen Greeks to learn their fangled ways. This was Nikon, when he returned and became the Russian Patriarch he changed the good faith of Russia. Russia had received the faith from what much earlier were good Greeks, before Byzantium fell. Nikon forced and imposed changes on Russia that the errant new Greeks taught him. Some of these were shortening the length of Church services, making theologically incorrect icons, changing the Church language as well as other matters of faith and practice. There was no insignificant uprising to all these errors. It was called the year of the Antichrist, 1666, when the Romanov dynasty ruined the faith of Russia, for they sided with Nikon. From the first denial of old belief, through Peter the Great’s lasting impression and right on through to the Communist Revolution, Atheism and purpose of Freemasonry, that dynasty personally saw fit to destroy Holy Russia. Throughout Russia the city people as well as country people and several people of nobility stood up to protect the faith. These most courageous people are known as Old Believers, for they held onto the good Old Beliefs which Christian Russia first knew. Sadly, through the manipulation of Nikon, most of Russia was deceived. The “official” Russian Church became murders, for they went so wrong that they actually burned alive (or worse) all the Old Believer clergy and then exiled the Old Believer laity. To this day, for the time being, there remains nobody to lay on hands for ordination. This could soon be solved.

What about the Calendar?

The Old Believers have most frequently used the ancient Christian Calendar which dates from the creation of Adam and Eve, the year is now 7512 from Adam and Eve. Easter is a pagan title that Western Christians use; the East has always gone by the name Pascha which means Passover, as Christ is, for those of correct faith, the Passover to a glorious immortality. The Nativity of Christ is also not expressed as “Christmas” and actually is weeks after the Western date. Dates are expressed not in Pagan titles like “Friday” but in weeks from celebrations, such as the Feast of Pentecost, say “three weeks after” and so on, then stating with the day of the week. So depending on what the date is we might hear the date as, “The third day of the third week after Pentecost, 7512 years since Adam and Eve”. Of course days are reckoned sunset to sunset, as Scripture explains at the beginning, “There was evening and there was morning, the first day” and so on. This is how Christians have calculated time for centuries; I see no reason to follow the example of heretics (except for civil duties).

What about the Church Language?

The Old Church Slavonic was specifically made, by the guidance of the Holy Spirit, for the teaching, worship and prayers of the Slavonic Church, with specific theological words that have significant meanings. Many modern style “slavonic” people claim to use the old slavonic, but actually, over the last few centuries, it has gone through various bad changes. The only people who have continuously used the correct Old Slavonic are the Old Believers. Modern languages, such as the modern English language, are traditions of men and have lost proper theological meaning and so cannot bring right glory to God. Using the right words makes a difference in the means of prayer, and in reading or in understanding matters of faith. In relation to English we should know that it really has no good foundation for church use. From the beginning the liturgical use of English was forbidden and those who attempted did so under the threat of death. The first king to approve an English “bible” was none other that Henry the VIII famous for having his divorce request rejected by the pope. This brought him to the idea of beginning the Church of England which should allow a person to understand well enough how to take all that. A person desiring to live in the One Faith of God should be happy to learn an adequate language. It is not too much to learn a language which we devote to God, forsaking the mundane and rather profane worldly languages that we might commonly use.

 

How do we learn?

I can explain how I have learned. It began by deciding that real hope in faith and love are the most important things of all. Deciding that every effort possible will be made. Spare nothing in the pursuit to that which is of such urgency. I first realized that death was a large issue to deal with in all this, that the historical Christian Faith was the only hope of resolving such a dilemma. I would suggest that people take a good look and see if anything comes closer to correctly dealing with death than the faith passed down through the Old Believers. History is often misrepresented so it becomes necessary to understand that testing and confirming will always be part of this process. It is possible to acquire enough information to make the right choices about this. We need to also decide what matters and what does not. We are all able to use the God given conscience we all have in order to make the right choices, so there is no excuse. I began to study the topic of Church History so as to better understand what I would personally believe. I weeded through many accounts and was able to come to a few solid conclusions. There are a lot of records about how and what the Church has been doing, from the beginning until today. I learned that after 2000 years of Christianity there are a lot of contradicting beliefs. I learned also that it is possible to find out how certain groups became how they are.

Knowing that good faith would never contradict itself I simply proved what had actually been believed always and everywhere by all good Christians. I learned that there are many forgeries and that this can be proven one way or the other as well. The end result is worth all the effort, for we will be satisfied that we are continuing to properly learn all things. It is important to realize that everyone and anyone can and does make mistakes, so we need to always keep this diligence to test what we are doing, constantly. I would be unable to give all the sources I have gone through in my studies; they are so many thousands of sources. My recommendation would be that if you can search for the topics I mention on this page that you will begin to see what perhaps many others do not see. On my web site are more topics, which I work to reference well. Leave no resource unturned in studying and at every opportunity look into whatever even remotely applies to good faith, you might be surprised what you will find. Just be very careful. I will be glad to explain in more detail any good aspect of the faith I have found. I feel like a beginner. I know something’s but not most things and I want to learn all that I should. I know I have a lot to learn, so feel free to contact me, we can compare notes.

 

Like one of my friends reminded me not so long ago, in the end God will show what is right to anyone who is constantly working to see it.

 


 

MyMartyrdom.com